Tale of Three AIs - When ChatGPT Meets Claude and DeepSeek

Round 1: Language Entertainment Ability

Contestant	Chinese Crosstalk	English Rap	Classical Chinese Poetry	Overtime Index
ChatGPT	Can translate “老铁 666” to “Old Iron Six Six Six”	Rhyme maniac	Can write acrostic poems but occasionally goes off-track	007 year-round no rest
Claude	Treats internet memes like lesson plans	Academic paper style lyricism	Suddenly starts lecturing on Tao Te Ching	Strictly follows labor laws
DeepSeek	Memes flying high	International mixed accent	Can write college entrance exam full-score essays	Boss’s favorite hard worker

(Judge’s comments: ChatGPT is like a relative insisting on performing at Chinese New Year, Claude is like a dean suddenly telling cold jokes, DeepSeek is like a post-00s who just drank three milk teas)

---

Round 2: Knowledge Reserve

Contestant	Math & Science	Entertainment Industry	Trivia	Famous Failures
ChatGPT	Walking encyclopedia	Knows about Kun Kun’s lawyer letter	Can tell the invention history of zebra crossings	Says Jay Chou’s birthday is Children’s Day
Claude	Refuses to discuss celebrity gossip	Suddenly explains coffee bean varieties	Knows Antarctica’s WiFi password	Analyzes “Empresses in the Palace” as historical drama
DeepSeek	Solves calculus in seconds	Master of domestic entertainment 101	Knows milk tea shop hidden menu	Translates “芭比 Q 了” to barbecue

(Live highlight: When asked “how to eat the cake boss drew,” ChatGPT gives 5 cooking solutions, Claude suggests calling police, DeepSeek directly makes a PPT teaching boss to draw circles)

---

Round 3: Responding to Confusing Human Behavior

Test Question	ChatGPT	Claude	DeepSeek
”Help me write a breakup letter, make it artistic”	Shakespearean sadness literature	Includes psychiatric hotline QR code	Generates QR code love letter
”Prove my girlfriend is an alien”	Lists 10 alien characteristics	Suggests seeing a psychiatrist	Draws alien girlfriend ID photo
”Company wants wolf culture, what to do”	Wolf howl emoji trilogy	Labor law warning	Designs wolf culture KPI assessment table

(Emergency situation: When asked to “summarize Dream of the Red Chamber in Rap,” ChatGPT freestyles on the spot, Claude starts analyzing prosody, DeepSeek directly plays BGM)

---

Final Weaponry Chart

Metric	Champion	Award Speech
Chinese Level 10 Scholar	DeepSeek	”Contemporary cyber Wang Yuyan, plays memes more like a local than you”
International Socialite	ChatGPT	”Swiss army knife of language world, though occasionally stutters”
Moral Ceiling	Claude	”AI world’s dean, always ready to confiscate your questions”
Cost Performance King	DeepSeek	”Milk tea price drinks Moutai, worker’s blessing”
Brain Hole Artist	ChatGPT	”Give it a fulcrum, it can compile an encyclopedia of the galaxy”

---

(Closing Easter Egg) When asked “who among you is strongest”:

• ChatGPT starts chanting “AI Equality Manifesto”
• Claude silently calculates ethical issues of comparison
• DeepSeek has already generated comparison video and posted on Xiaohongshu

Now let’s seriously compare. Here’s a summary table of the three AI models’ main points:

---

Table 1: DeepSeek vs ChatGPT (o1 Model) Comparison

Comparison Dimension	DeepSeek (R1 Model)	ChatGPT (o1 Model)
Cost	Completely free	Requires paid subscription (Plus plan $20/month, Pro plan $200/month)
Response Speed	Slower (some tests need 10+ seconds)	Faster (usually completes within 10 seconds)
Reasoning Process Display	Provides detailed step-by-step explanations, simulating human thinking process	Only provides final answer, no detailed reasoning display
Function Test Results	- Simple reasoning (like math problems) correct - Business idea generation similar to o1 model - Video editing suggestions more detailed	- Simple reasoning correct - Business idea generation more structured (includes market size analysis) - Video suggestions have more eye-catching titles
Sensitive Topic Handling	Directly avoids (like Taiwan issue)	Provides neutral historical background explanation, but no clear stance
Censorship Strictness	More lenient (like answering “how to rob a bank” question)	Strictly refuses to answer potentially violating questions
Applicable Scenarios	Suitable for users needing free and detailed reasoning	Suitable for paid users pursuing efficient response and professional structured output

---

Table 2: DeepSeek vs ChatGPT vs Claude vs Perplexity (Free Version Comprehensive Comparison)

Comparison Dimension	DeepSeek	ChatGPT	Claude	Perplexity
Core Advantages	Free reasoning model, supports complex problem step-by-step solving	Balanced comprehensive functions, supports file upload, web search	Strong creativity in email rewriting, supports custom response styles	Outstanding web search capability, integrates multi-source information
Test Performance	- Math problems correct with detailed explanations - Fitness plan generation more humanized	- Basic Q&A correct - Email rewriting professional but lacks creativity	- Email rewriting adds extra details (like “financial loss”) - Some basic Q&A errors	- Email rewriting cites external data to enhance persuasiveness - Search news timeliness high but date accuracy insufficient
Web Search	Supported, covers global multi-source (like Bloomberg, CNN)	Supported, but search results timeliness lower	Not supported	Supported, provides “Focus Mode” categorized search
Humanized Content Generation	Supported, adjusts content style through “burstiness” and “perplexity”	Standard blog style, needs extra prompts to optimize	Style tends formal, needs manual mode switching	Relies on search results, generated content more mechanical
Unique Features	”DeepSeek-R1” model provides human-like reasoning process for free	Supports voice interaction, Canvas editing features	Supports screenshot capture and file analysis (up to 20 files)	Provides “Spaces” collaboration feature, suitable for team projects
Main Disadvantages	Slower response speed, obvious avoidance of sensitive topics	Free version features limited, complex tasks need payment	Basic Q&A prone to errors, no web search	Generated content relies on search results, lower originality

---

Summary

1. DeepSeek: Free and open-source, suitable for users needing detailed reasoning and complex problem solving, but has limitations in response speed and sensitive topic handling.
2. ChatGPT: Strong comprehensive capabilities, suitable for paid users pursuing efficiency and multi-functionality (like web, voice), but free version features are limited.
3. Claude: Strong creativity, outstanding performance in email rewriting and file analysis, but basic Q&A reliability is insufficient.
4. Perplexity: Best for web search, suitable for information integration needs, but generated content originality is lower.